The Sanskritists add the fifth incident Saapa.Īs this is quite uncommon, says the commentator, Valluvar did not include it in his treatment of the subject. In the Karpiyal section again Parimelaalagar would find corresponding terms for the different incidents like According to that authority, Kalaviyal and Karpiyal correspond to the Samyoga and Vipralambha of the KAMASUTRA treatises. According to this whole can be conveniently divided into Kalaviyal and Karpiyal, and these again are based on the five tinais peculiar to the Tamils.īut the celebrated commentator of the Kural, Parimel azagarwould again find correspondences between this subject of the subject and that in Sanskrit literature. One is that Valluvar gives expression to purely Tamil aspect of Kama (sexual desire). There are two views with regard to this particular section. In this section we will look at the Parnellism between the Kamasastra in Sanskrit with Tirukkuralįollowing is from the book Studies in Tamil Literature by V R Ramachandra Dikshitar: So far we have seen the comparison between Tiru Valluvar’s Tirukkural with Bhagavad Gita, Manu Smrti, Arthasastra of Kautilya/Chanaya, Kamandaki, Ramayana and Mahabharata.
Please read first four parts posted in the past few days and continue here:– G U Pope and V R R Dikshitar in this Kamasastra is compared with Tirukkural along with other books. Part 5 of Tirukkural- Bhagavad Gita Comparison by Rev. Pictures shown here are taken from various sources such as Facebook friends, Books, Google and newspapers thanks
0 kommentar(er)
